FACTS: Frazier was involved in a collision while driving a car owned by Grant. Grant’s car was insured under a policy issued by Hanover Insurance Group. The driver of the other car involved in the collision, Williams, filed a claim with Hanover to recover the cost to repair her car. In her sworn statement to Hanover, Williams said the collision happened when Frazier swerved into her lane as the cars approached a toll plaza, and the front driver’s side of his car struck the rear passenger side of her car. Although Williams said there was only minor damage to both cars, she still wanted to report the collision to the police. Frazier, however, convinced her not to call the police and, in exchange, he agreed to let Williams make a cell phone video recording in which he admitted that he hit the rear passenger side of her car with the front driver’s side of his car when he swerved into her lane as the cars approached the toll plaza. Williams also took photos of the damage to both cars.

Did the trial court err in denying appellants’ claims of immunity from civil liability for Frazier’s claim of malicious prosecution?

Click here to read more and for the answer